01
Local service businesses
One chain per market: the service, the city, a topic that belongs to both.
In the record
- Beltway HVAC
- Voyager Plumbing
- Spartan Plumbing
Service 05Market-level authority
Service, then market, then a topic that belongs to both, then a publication that covers it. One chain per location, never one campaign stretched across all of them.
Same number of placements. One of these can be read by city.
Built location by location: the service, the market, a topic that belongs to both, and a publication that covers it.
Six service-area pages competing locally, and every placement pointing at the one page that already ranks.
A national article with a town inserted into the title, which reads exactly as retrofitted as it is.
A campaign built in one city and reported across five, as though authority were transferable between them.
Listings are worth having and are not editorial placements. Counting them together hides how little of either there is.
Two different destinations with two different jobs, given the same anchors and the same topics.
Nothing in the article a resident of that city would recognise, which is the whole reason a local link is worth more.
Drag the divider — or use the arrow keys
01
One chain per market: the service, the city, a topic that belongs to both.
In the record
02
Service-area pages that each need their own authority, not one campaign stretched thin.
In the record
03
Community and development pages, where the market name is the search.
In the record
04
Category pages competing against directories and every other agency in the city.
In the record
05
Products whose buyers search the problem long before they search the category.
In the record
06
White-label delivery under your brand. No named account in the record; /for-agencies has the terms.
Not in the record
How white-label delivery runsThe cities you actually serve and the page that serves each one. A market without its own page cannot hold a local placement.
AC repair in Arbutus is a different campaign from AC maintenance in Columbia, and the record treats them as such.
What a resident of that city would ask about that service — climate, housing stock, permits, season. That question is the article.
A section that covers home improvement, local business or the region itself. The local angle has to belong there, not merely be tolerated.
The market's own page or its map listing, with an anchor that names the city and the service. Never the homepage by default.
So coverage can be read city by city, and the market that has been quietly ignored for four months is visible.
ResultA verified live URL, logged against the campaign.
Every row is an artefact — something you are holding at the end of a week. None of them is an outcome, because an outcome is not something a supplier can hand over.
Every city in scope with its destination — service-area page, location page or map listing — named before anything is pitched.
Which services are worth pursuing in which cities. Not every service deserves a campaign in every market, and saying so saves the budget.
Questions specific to that city and that service. Seasonal, regulatory, climate or housing-stock angles rather than a generic guide with a place name.
Sections that genuinely cover the region or the category, checked the same way any other opportunity is checked.
City-and-service phrasings drawn from the campaign's anchor distribution, so local variants do not quietly become the whole profile.
Every published piece opened, the anchor read and the destination followed to the right market's page.
The record cut by city, which is the only view that shows an uneven campaign while it is still correctable.
318
7
5
127
The market-led cut of the supplied delivery record. Placements and destinations only — the sheet holds no local pack positions or traffic figures, so none are claimed.
127
Tracked placements
Markets worked as separate chains
AC repair, installation and maintenance. One product, opened into the questions its buyers were already asking somebody else.
View the full case studyBy which ones have a page worth sending a link to. A city with no dedicated page has nowhere for local authority to land, and building the page is usually the cheaper first move.
Both appear in the record, and they do different jobs. The service-area page is the one that has to rank; the map listing is a destination worth citing in its own right. What does not work is treating them as interchangeable.
Something a resident would recognise — a season, a climate problem, a permit, the age of the housing stock. If the article would read identically with a different city in the title, it is not a local topic.
Occasionally, for a regional publication, and it is worth less than the same effort spent on one market. The record is built as separate chains precisely because merged campaigns are impossible to read afterwards.
No. Listings are worth having and are a different discipline with different suppliers. Counting them alongside editorial placements would inflate the record with things it was not built to measure.
As many as have their own pages and their own topics, though they will not move at the same speed — a market with two plausible publications takes longer than one with twenty, and pretending otherwise is how uneven campaigns start.
It is what it is built for. The record's largest local campaign runs four Maryland markets as four separate chains, each with its own destination, its own topics and its own anchors.
No. Local pack position depends heavily on proximity, listing quality and review signals — most of which sit outside link building entirely. What this service is accountable for is placements that name the market and point at the page that serves it.
Still something here unanswered?
Send the question with the domain and the page it is about. It is read the same day, by me — there is no auto-responder.
Start here
Send the cities you serve and the page behind each one. The reply says which markets have somewhere for a link to land and which need a page before they need a campaign.